Аннотация

Livestock management is a critical aspect of agricultural sustainability and food security. Today, there is a pressing need for advanced tools in cattle behavior analysis to improve livestock welfare and productivity. We aimed to enhance cattle behavior classification by using accelerometers fitted in wearable collars. Deep learning techniques were employed to classify behavioral patterns in cattle such as feeding, moving, and lying. Ultimately, our study sought to improve livestock management practices, including the monitoring of health and overall well-being.
The study was conducted in a local barn, where cattle were outfitted with specially designed collars with accelerometer sensors. These sensors recorded intricate movements, facilitating the collection of comprehensive behavioral data. Deep learning algorithms were used to process and analyze the accelerometer data, enabling precise classification of various behaviors exhibited by the cattle.
Our results showed the effectiveness of AI-driven classification techniques in distinguishing cattle behaviors with a high degree of accuracy. Our findings underscore the potential of deep learning techniques in optimizing livestock management practices.
This research significantly advances livestock management by offering a simple continuous monitoring solution for cattle behavior. Deep learning techniques not only enhance our understanding of cattle behavior but also pave the way for intelligent systems that empower farmers to make informed decisions. By promoting healthier and more productive livestock, this research contributes to the broader goal of enhancing global food security and sustainability in the livestock industry.

Ключевые слова

Precision agriculture, food security, livestock farming, cattle veterinary, accelerometer data, behavior classification, Convolutional Neural Networks

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

1. Akhigbe BI, Munir K, Akinade O, Akanbi L, Oyedele LO. IoT Technologies for Livestock Management: A Review of Present Status, Opportunities, and Future Trends. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2021;5(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5010010
2. Buller H, Blokhuis H, Lokhorst K, Silberberg M, Veissier I. Animal Welfare Management in a Digital World. Animals. 2020;10(10):1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101779
3. Sahu BK, Parganiha A, Pati AK. Behavior and foraging ecology of cattle: A review. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2020;40:50–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2020.08.004
4. Džermeikaitė K, Bačėninaitė D, Antanaitis R. Innovations in Cattle Farming: Application of Innovative Technologies and Sensors in the Diagnosis of Diseases. Animals. 2023;13(5):780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050780
5. Neethirajan S. Transforming the Adaptation Physiology of Farm Animals through Sensors. Animals. 2020;10(9):1512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091512
6. Qiao Y, Kong H, Clark C, Lomax S, Su D, Eiffert S, et al. Intelligent Perception-Based Cattle Lameness Detection and Behaviour Recognition: A Review. Animals. 2021;11(11):3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113033
7. Neethirajan S, Kemp B. Digital Livestock Farming. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research. 2021;32:100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2021.100408
8. Benaissa S, Tuyttens FAM, Plets D, Martens L,Vandaele L, Joseph W, et al. Improved cattle behaviour monitoring by combining Ultra-Wideband location and accelerometer data. Animal. 2023;17(4):100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100730
9. Wagner N, Antoine V, Mialon M-M, Lardy R, Silberberg M, Koko J, et al. Machine learning to detect behavioural anomalies in dairy cows under subacute ruminal acidosis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;170:105233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105233
10. Balasso P, Marchesini G, Ughelini N, Serva L, Andrighetto I. Machine Learning to Detect Posture and Behavior in Dairy Cows: Information from an Accelerometer on the Animal’s Left Flank. Animals. 2021;11(10):2972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102972
11. Smith JE, Pinter-Wollman N. Observing the unwatchable: Integrating automated sensing, naturalistic observations and animal social network analysis in the age of big data. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2021;90(1):62–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13362
12. Jabir B, Rabhi L, Falih N. RNN- and CNN-based weed detection for crop improvement: An overview. Foods and Raw Materials. 2021;9(2):387–396. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2021-2-387-396
13. Arablouei R, Wang L, Currie L, Yates J, Alvarenga FAP, Bishop-Hurley GJ. Animal behavior classification via deep learning on embedded systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2023;207:107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107707
14. Allahbakhshi H, Conrow L, Naimi B, Weibel R. Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection. Sensors. 2020;20(3):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030588
15. Heydarian H, Adam M, Burrows T, C Collins, Rollo ME. Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2019;11(5):1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051168
16. Hassan M, Park J-H, Han M-H. Enhancing Livestock Management with IoT-based Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Approach for Health Monitoring, Location Tracking, Behavior Analysis, and Environmental Optimization. Journal of Sustainable Urban Futures. 2023;13(6):34–46. https://neuralslate.com/index.php/Journal-of-Sustainable-Urban-Fut/article/view/18
17. Wang W-H, Hsu W-S. Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Wearable IoT System in Long-Term Care Environments. Sensors. 2023;23(13):5913. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135913
18. Cao R, Tu W, Yang C, Li Q, Liu J, Zhu J, et al. Deep learning-based remote and social sensing data fusion for urban region function recognition. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2020;163:82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.02.014
19. Cabezas J, Yubero R, Visitación B, Navarro-García J, Algar MJ, Cano EL, et al. Analysis of Accelerometer and GPS Data for Cattle Behaviour Identification and Anomalous Events Detection. Entropy. 2022;24(3):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24030336
20. Monteiro A, Santos S, Gonçalves P. Precision Agriculture for Crop and Livestock Farming – Brief Review. Animals. 2021;11(8):2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082345
21. Liu Y, Pu H, Sun D-W. Efficient extraction of deep image features using convolutional neural network (CNN) for applications in detecting and analysing complex food matrices. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021;113:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.042
22. Chen C, Zhu W, Norton T. Behaviour recognition of pigs and cattle: Journey from computer vision to deep learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021;187:106255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106255
23. Tan HX, Aung NN, Tian J, Chua MCH, Yang YO. Time series classification using a modified LSTM approach from accelerometer-based data: A comparative study for gait cycle detection. Gait and Posture. 2019;74:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.007
24. Dávila-Montero S, Dana-Lê JA, Bente G, Hall AT, Mason AJ. Review and Challenges of Technologies for Real-Time Human Behavior Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems. 2021;15(1):2–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2021.3060617
25. Lemmens L, Schod K, Fuerst-Walt B, Schwarzenbacher H, Egger-Danner C, Linke K, et al. The Combined Use of Automated Milking System and Sensor Data to Improve Detection of Mild Lameness in Dairy Cattle. Animals. 2023;13(7):1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071180
26. Volkmann N, Kulig B, Hoppe S, Stracke J, Hensel O, Kemper N. On-farm detection of claw lesions in dairy cows based on acoustic analyses and machine learning. Journal of Dairy Science. Journal of Dairy Science. 2021;104(5):5921–5931. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19206
27. Daneault J-F, Vergara-Diaz G, Parisi F, Admati C, Alfonso C, Bertoli M, et al. Accelerometer data collected with a minimum set of wearable sensors from subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Scientific Data. 2021;8:48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00830-0
28. Qiu S, Zhao H, Jiang N, Wang Z, Liu L, An Y, et al. Multi-sensor information fusion based on machine learning for real applications in human activity recognition: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Information Fusion. 2022;80:241–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.006
29. Rashamo VP, Sejian V, Pragna P, Lees AM, Bagath M, Krishnan G, et al. Prediction models, assessment methodologies and biotechnological tools to quantify heat stress response in ruminant livestock. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2019;63:1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01735-9
30. El Moutaouakil K, Jdi H, Jabir B, Falih N. Digital Farming: A Survey on IoT-based Cattle Monitoring Systems and Dashboards. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics. 2023;15(2):31–39. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2023.150203
31. El Moutaouakil K, Falih N. A design of a smart farm system for cattle monitoring. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 2023;32(2):857–864. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i2.pp857-864
32. Farooq MS, Sohail OO, Abid A, Rasheed S. A Survey on the Role of IoT in Agriculture for the Implementation of Smart Livestock Environment. IEEE Access. 2022;10:9483–9505. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142848
33. Cabrera VE, Fadul-Pacheco L. Future of dairy farming from the Dairy Brain perspective: Data integration, analytics, and applications. International Dairy Journal. 2021;121:105069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105069
34. Herlin A, Brunberg E, Hultgren J, Högberg N, Rydberg A, Skarin A. Animal Welfare Implications of Digital Tools for Monitoring and Management of Cattle and Sheep on Pasture. Animals. 2021;11(3):829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030829
35. Rial C, Laplacette A,Caixeta L, Florentino C, Peña-Mosca F, Giordano JO. Metabolic-digestive clinical disorders of lactating dairy cows were associated with alterations of rumination, physical activity, and lying behavior monitored by an ear-attached sensor. Journal of Dairy Science. 2023;106(12):9323–9344. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23156
36. Fan B, Bryant R, Greer A. Behavioral Fingerprinting: Acceleration Sensors for Identifying Changes in Livestock Health. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal. 2022;5(4):435–454. https://doi.org/10.3390/j5040030
37. Tran D-N, Nguyen TN, Khanh PCP, Tran D-T. An IoT-Based Design Using Accelerometers in Animal Behavior Recognition Systems. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2022;22(18):17515–17528. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3051194
38. Chapa JM, Maschat K, Iwersen M, Baumgartner J, Drillich M. Accelerometer systems as tools for health and welfare assessment in cattle and pigs – A review. Behavioural Processes. 2020;181:104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104262
39. Danso-Abbeam G, Dagunga G, Ehiakpor DS, Ogundeji AA, Setsoafia ED, Awuni JA. Crop–livestock diversification in the mixed farming systems: implication on food security in Northern Ghana. Agriculture and Food Security. 2021;10:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00319-4
40. Borges Oliveira DA, Ribeiro Pereira LG, Bresolin T, Pontes Ferreira RE, Reboucas Dorea JR. A review of deep learning algorithms for computer vision systems in livestock. Livestock Science. 2021;253:104700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104700