ISSN 2308-4057 (Print),
ISSN 2310-9599 (Online)

Providing food security in the existing tendencies of population growth and political and economic instability in the world

Аннотация
Food security, namely, the stability in availability of food for the population is important for the wellbeing and health of all mankind. In the modern world the destabilization of food the basic reasons of which are population growth, poverty, lack of investments into the agricultural industry, climate and weather, wars and resettlement, etc., is noted. The existing forecasts of the dynamics of population growth till 2050 are limited to 8-11 billion. The most part of this growth will accrue to the developing countries of Africa and Asia while the population of the developed countries, on average, will remain unchanged (except the United States of America due to international migration). The geographical distribution of undernourished people looks similarly, less than 5% of the population accrue to the developed countries, more than 12% - to the developing ones, on average in the world - more than 10%, with the prediction of further decrease. In spite of the fact that the percentage of mankind of the general biomass of our planet is insignificant, its activity is comprehended and anthropogenous as it became one of the most important forces changing processes in the biosphere. The interrelation of population growth and the necessary dynamics of food using the example of the protein, carbohydrate and fatty components in the world and in the former Soviet Union is considered in the work. The average forecast of population is used for the analysis. In case of the realization of the corresponding biotechnologies, the opportunity, if not of providing food security, then that of reduction of the number of undernourished people in the world, of food and energy resource conservation and of negative effect on the environment is quite achievable.
Ключевые слова
Food security, growth of the number of mankind, hunger, Customs Union, Eurasian Economic Community
ВВЕДЕНИЕ

The mankind, in a varying degree, has faced hunger from the moment of its emergence. It is common practice to designate the decrease in agricultural production, industrialization and urbanization, armed and ethnic conflicts, the deterioration in the ecological situation as the reasons of hunger, however the uncontrollable population growth in the developing countries is considered to be the main one [1–2]. The global food deficiency is, as a rule, during world wars, natural cataclysms, epidemics, but it was until the 20th century when attempts to provide food security were made [3–6]. In 1945 the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) the main objective of which consisted in the assistance to agriculture for the reduction of the problem of hunger and poverty was created on the basis of the United Nations. In 1962 the World Food Programme of the UN was organized to confront world hunger. Ten thousand of people who annually help on average about 100 million undernourished people in 75 countries of the world (www.ru.wfp.org) work in the organization. In 1996 the member states of the UN adopted the Millennium Declaration (MPG) to improve the welfare of mankind by elimination of hunger, poverty and diseases (http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals) which resulted in the decrease in hunger by half during 1990–2015. In 2009 FAO organized the world summit on food security. Collateral events: the expert forum "How to Feed the World in 2050", the Committee on World Food Security and the World Food Day on which the declaration (WPS) with the statement for the decrease in hunger by half by 2015 (ru.wikipedia.org) was adopted. According to FAO (Fig. 1–3), (http://www.fao.org/hunger) the number of undernourished people in the world in 2015 was 793 million people (malnutrition and hunger, directly or indirectly, are the reasons of more than half of child deaths [7–10], the main reasons for death and invalidization of the person, owing to the reduction of body's immunity and the decrease in its immunodefences because of lack of nutrients [11–15]). In June, 2015 the head of FAO called for the global movement for full eradication of hunger, defining poverty as the reason for hunger. The last program of the UN “Zero Hunger” up to 2030 is based on a thesis about the possibility of eradication of the problem of hunger only after eliminating the interrelated reasons of poverty and, actually, hunger.

Figure 1 Distribution of the number of hungry people in the developing regions: the real and expected result (Data for 2014–2016 are preliminary estimates, MPG is the Millennium Development Goals, WPS is the the World Food Summit).

Figure 2 Distribution of the number and percentage of undernourished people across the regions by 1990–1992 and 2014–2016. (The value of segments is proportional to the total number of undernourished people for every period. All the indicators are rounded. The data for 2014–2016 are preliminary estimates).

Figure 3 Trends of decrease in malnutrition across regions.

The actions and programs which performed by the UN act as the world platforms of discussion and development of the complex strategy of fight against hunger on the basis of scientific, ecological, technological, social and economic and political aspects [16–20].

The greatest intensity of addition of the population of the globe was in the 20th century, it is explained, first of all, by a significant industrial progress. According to different forecasts the population growth will continue [21–23], at least, to the middle of the 21st century and will have been from 8 to 11 billion people by 2050 (Fig. 4). For this reason, there is a need of providing all people with the available, good nutrition rich with nutrients [3, 6, 24–28]. The purpose of the overview is the analysis of opportunities of providing global food security and decrease in the number of undernourished people taking into account the population growth tendencies, including that of the developing countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia) of the Customs Union and the Euroasian Economic Community.

РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ И ИХ ОБСУЖДЕНИЕ

The analysis and projection of population allow to regulate and, in case of need, to introduce amendments in the scenarios of distribution of the existing and the renewal of the missing resources. A long-term forecast allowing to distribute the efforts of mankind in the present circumstances of the civilization and distribution of natural resources is necessary for the the solution of the similar tasks.

The first attempt to estimate the population growth and the possibility of providing all people with food was made by the English economist Thomas Malthus [29, 30]. He considered that population increases exponentially if it is not restrained by any reasons, and it does not foretell anything good for the planet, a food and ecological crisis is ahead as the quantity of food resources grows only at an arithmetic rate.

There existed for a long time an opinion that the growth of the world population is subject to the hyperbolic law, however, the analysis of empirical data (past and the present) by modern science showed that the unrestrained growth is not possible under the conditions of the existing restrictions. And there was a delay of birth rate in the second half of the last century. The English biologist Julian Huxley gave the most exact forecast (1964) - the population of the planet will have reached 6 billion people by 2000, according to the UN, this date was October 12, 1999 [31, 32]. According to the UN, the increase in population is 74 million people now. The largest growth of the population occurs and will occur in the underdeveloped countries while the population of the developed countries will remain within the present limits. The USA can make an exception because of migration flows. According to FAO, it is supposed that the population of the planet will have exceeded 9 billion people by 2050.

Some of the most widely used forecasting models of population up to 2100 which, to some accuracy, have a single quality characteristic of dynamics are known, the difference is in quantitative values (Fig. 4).

Figure 4 Dynamics of growth of the world population with the results of the forecast till 2100 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projections_of_population_growth): 1 – the calculated data (US Census Bureau historical estimates); 2 – the high case scenario of the UN; 3 – the medium case scenario of the UN; 4 – the low case scenario of the UN; 5 – the actual data.

These data include the forecasts of the UN, International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA), the World Bank and the Russian science professor Sergey Petrovich Kapitsa who paid considerable attention to the study of problematics of population of mankind (Table 1).

Table 1 World Population Forecast by year (billion)

The forecast of the UN is the total scenario of birth rate and mortality by nine regions of the world: the population of Earth will have reached the value of 11.600 billion by 2150 and further will be stabilized.

The forecasts of IIASA are based on the split of the world into six regions and the use of ten various scenarios of development, they will be in effect until 2100.

The World Bank is an international financial organization created for the purpose of providing the organization of financial and technical assistance to the developing countries, one of its activities is the strategic tasks of development of humanity and certain regions.

The mathematical model of Kapitsa S.P. (MK) defines the asymptotic transition to the limit of 12 billion in 2100, 11 billion are expected by 2050. Kapitsa's work showed that the growth of population of the Earth does not depend on additional variables during considerable time intervals, but only on the temporary variable and the population size. According to calculations, the stabilization of the world population is expected to be stabilized at the level of 14 billion persons by 2135 [33].

Fig. 4 provides the change of population of the Earth, taking into account the data of the UN (medium variant) and the existing forecasts. This situation will not go unnoticed in terms of providing the quality of life. There is already a certain territorial and food deficiency. Eleven children die of hunger every minute in the world. According to FAO, more than one billion people constantly suffer from hunger in the world. Most part of them lives in the Asian-Pacific Region and in Africa.

Fig. 5 provides the information about the percentage of undernourished people (databank.worldbank.org). Certain results of fight against hunger are obviously achieved. By 2012 the growth of the world population had been about 30% of the quantity in 1991 while the decrease in the number of undernourished people had been 25% against the background of the growth of total of the population. Considering the average prediction of population growth, the preservation of the existing tendencies of decrease in the number of undernourished people will have inherently provided the growth of their number by 2025. Neither programs of the UN nor the existing development of technologies including that in agriculture are effective to control this trend.

Figure 5 Dynamics of growth of the world population and percentage of undernourished people in the world: 1 is population; 2 is the number of undernourished people.

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
  1. Wang S.X., Fu Y.B., and Zhang Z.G. Population growth and the environmental Kuznets curve. China Economic Review, 2015, vol. 36, pp. 146-165.
  2. Cheeseman J. Food Security in the Face of Salinity, Drought, Climate Change, and Population Growth. In: Khan M.A., Ozturk M., Gul B., and Ahmed M.Z. (eds.) Halophytes for Food Security in Dry Lands. Oxford: Academic Press, 2016, pp. 111-123.
  3. Martin K.S., Colantonio A.G., Picho K., and Boyle K.E. Self-efficacy is associated with increased food security in novel food pantry program. SSM-Population Health, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 62-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ssmph.2016.01.005.
  4. Borch A. and Kjaernes U. Food security and food insecurity in Europe: An analysis of the academic discourse (1975–2013). Appetite, 2016, vol. 103, pp. 137–147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.005.
  5. Gohar A.A. and Cashman A. A methodology to assess the impact of climate variability and change on water resources, food security and economic welfare. Agricultural Systems, 2016, vol. 147, pp. 51-64.
  6. Burchi F. and De Muro P. From food availability to nutritional capabilities: Advancing food security analysis. Food Policy, 2016, vol. 60, pp. 10-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.008.
  7. Maniscalco J. Malnutrition. In: Zaoutis L.B. and Chiang V.W. (eds.) Comprehensive Pediatric Hospital Medicine. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Mosby Elsevier, 2007, pp. 633-640.
  8. Gupta A. and Dadhich J.P. Infant Malnutrition/Breastfeeding. In: Heggenhougen K. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Amsterdam Boston: Academic Press, 2008, pp. 554-562.
  9. Hecht C., Weber M., Grote V., et al. Disease associated malnutrition correlates with length of hospital stay in children. Clinical Nutrition, 2015, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 53-59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2014.01.003.
  10. Barbieri M. Infant and Child Mortality in the Less Developed World. In: Wright J.D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, 2015, pp. 21-26.
  11. Norman K., Pichard C., Lochs H. and Pirlich M. Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition. Clinical Nutrition, 2008, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.007.
  12. Marco J., Barba R., Zapatero A., et al. Prevalence of the notification of malnutrition in the departments of internal medicine and its prognostic implications. Clinical Nutrition, 2011, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 450-454. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2010.12.005.
  13. Solomons N.W. Malnutrition, immunity and infection. In: Calder P.C. and Yaqoob P. (eds.) Diet, Immunity and Inflammation. Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013, pp. 686-717.
  14. Gastalver-Martín C., Alarcón-Payer C., and León-Sanz M. Individualized measurement of disease-related malnutrition's costs. Clinical Nutrition, 2015, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 951–955. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2014.10.005.
  15. Rubin L.P. Historical Perspective of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease in Humans. In: Rosenfeld C.S. (ed.) The Epigenome and Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. Oxford: Academic Press, 2016, pp. 17-32.
  16. Smil V. Feeding the World: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2000. 388 p.
  17. Lang T. and Heasman M. Food Wars. The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. London: Earthscan, 2004. 364 p.
  18. McMichael P. A food regime analysis of the «world food crisis». Agriculture and Human Values, 2009, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 281-295.
  19. Awokuse T.O. Food aid impacts on recipient developing countries: A review of empirical methods and evidence. Journal of International Development, 2011, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 493-514.
  20. Edwards L. Food Fight: The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science, and Technology for Development. AgBioForum, 2012, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 70-76. Available at: http://agbioforum.org/v15n1/v15n1a09-edwards.htm. (accessed 7 February 2016).
  21. Scoones I. The politics of global assessments: the case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2009, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 547-571. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150903155008.
  22. Godfray H.C.J., Crute I.R., Haddad L., et al. The future of the global food system Philosophical Transactions of the Royal. Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010, vol. 365, no. 1554, pp. 2769-2777.
  23. Godfray H.C.J., Beddington J.R., Crute I.R., et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 2010, vol. 327, no. 5967, pp. 812-818.
  24. Pinstrup-Andersen P. Food security: definition and measurement. Food Security, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-7.
  25. Nally D. The biopolitics of food provisioning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2011, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 37-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00413.x.
  26. Kummu M., De Moel H., Porkka M., et al. Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, vol. 438, pp. 477-489. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092.
  27. Tscharntke T., Clough Y., Jackson L., et al. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 2012, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 53-59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.biocon.2012.01.068.
  28. Pirani S.I. and Arafat H.A. Interplay of food security, agriculture and tourism within GCC countries. Global Food Security, 2016, vol. 9, pp. 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.05.002.
  29. Huzel J.P. The Popularization of Malthus in Early Nineteenth-Century England: Martineau, Cobbett and the Pauper Press. UK, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006. 266 p.
  30. Sauvy A. General Theory of Population. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1969. 551 p. (Russ. ed.: Sovi A. Obshchaya teoriya naseleniya. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1977. 503 p.).
  31. Huxley J. World population. Scientific American, 1956, vol. 194, pp. 64-76.
  32. Gall Ya.M. Julian Sorell Huxley 1887-1975. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2004. 294 p.
  33. Kapitza S.P. Skol'ko lyudey zhilo, zhivet i budet zhit' na zemle. Ocherk teorii rosta chelovechestva[How Many People Lived, Live and will Live on the Earth. Sketch of the Theory of Growth of Mankind]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1999. 136 p.
  34. Lucas R.Jr. Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money. American Economic Reviewer, 1980, vol. 70, no. 50, pp. 1005-1114.
  35. Dyson T. and Gráda C.Ó. (eds.) Famine demography: perspectives from the past and present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 295 p.
  36. De Waal A. Famile that kills: Darfur, Sudan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 288 p.
  37. Stancua A. The Relationship among Population Number, Food Domestic Consumption and Food Consumer Expenditure for Most Populous Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 22, pp. 333-342.
  38. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series, 916. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003. 149 p.
  39. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
  40. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids / Panel on Macronutrients, Panel on the Definition of Dietary Fiber, Subcommittee on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients, Subcommittee on Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes, and the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board. Washington: The national academies press, 2005. 1357 p.
  41. Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition: report of an expert consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 91. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010. 166 p.
  42. Global action plan for the prevention and control of NCDs 2013-2020. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. 55 p.
  43. Framework for Action. Second International Conference on Nutrition. Rome: FAO/WHO, 2014.
  44. Comprehensive implementation plan on maternal, infant and young child nutrition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014. 22 p.
  45. Rome Declaration on Nutrition. Second International Conference on Nutrition. Rome: FAO/WHO, 2014.
  46. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. December 2015. Available at: http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/. (accessed 7 February 2016).
  47. Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. 49 p.
  48. Normy fiziologicheskikh potrebnostey energii i pishchevykh veshchestv dlya razlichnykh grupp naseleniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii [Standards of Physiological Needs of Energy and Nutrients for Various Groups of the Population of the Russian Federation. Methodological Recommendations]. Moscow: Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009. 38 p.
  49. Frasera E., Legwegoha A., KC K. et al. Biotechnology or organic? Extensive or intensive? Global or local? A critical review of potential pathways to resolve the global food crisis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2016, vol. 48, pp. 78-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.006.
  50. Altieri M. and Rosset P. Ten reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food security, protect the environment, or reduce poverty in the developing world. In: Sherlock R. and Morrey J. (eds.) Ethical issues in biotechnology. UK, Oxford, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. pp. 175-182.
  51. Edgerton M.D. Increasing crop productivity to meet global needs for feed, food, and fuel. Plant Physiology, 2009, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 7-13.
  52. Tomlinson I. Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion: a critical perspective on a key discourse of food security in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 2013, vol. 29, pp. 81-90.
  53. Gosudarstva - chleny Tamozhennogo soyuza i Edinogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva v tsifrakh: statisticheskiy ezhegodnik [Member States of the Customs Union and Common Economic Space in Figures: Statistical Yearbook]. Moscow: Euroasian Economic Commission, 2014. 318 p.
  54. Narodnoe khozyaystvo SSSR v 1990 godu. Statisticheskiy ezhegodnik [National Economy of the USSR in 1990: Statistical Yearbook]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika Publ., 1991. 752 p.
  55. Narodnoe khozyaystvo RSFSR v 1990 godu: Statisticheskiy ezhegodnik [National Economy of the RSFSR in 1990: Statistical Yearbook]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika Publ., 1991. 76 p.
  56. Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy ezhegodnik: statisticheskiy sbornik [Statistical Yearbook of Russia: Statistical Collection]. Moscow: State Statistics Committee of the Russian Federation, 1995. 799 p.
  57. Sel'skoe khozyaystvo, okhota i lesovodstvo v Rossii 2004: statisticheskiy sbornik [Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry in Russia 2004: Statistical Collection]. Moscow: Russian Statistics Committee, 2004. 32 p.
  58. Sel'skoe khozyaystvo, okhota i okhotnich'e khozyaystvo, lesovodstvo v Rossii 2015: statisticheskiy sbornik [Agriculture, Hunting and Hunting economy, Forestry in Russia 2015: Statistical Collection]. Moscow: Russian Statistics Committee, 2015. 201 p.
  59. Obzor rynka rastitel'nogo masla Evraziysogo ekonomichesko gosoyuza za 2010-2014 gody[Overview of the Vegetable Oil Market of the Eurasian Economic Union for 2010-2014]. Moscow, 2015. 14 p.
  60. Sel'skoe khozyaystvo respubliki Belarus': statisticheskiy sbornik [Agriculture of the Republic of Belarus: Statistical Book]. Minsk: National Statistical Committee, 2016. 230 p.
  61. Obzor agroprodovol'stvennoy torgovoy politiki v postsovetskikh stranakh 2014-15 [Overview of the Current Agricultural Trade Policies in the Post-Soviet Countries in 2014-2015]. FAO, 2016. 175 p.
  62. Badgley C. and Perfecto I. Can organic agriculture feed the world? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2007, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 80-86.
  63. Jaggard K.W., Qi A., and Ober E.S. Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010, vol. 365, no. 1554, pp. 2835-2851.
  64. Hinrichs C.C. The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies, 2003, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 33-45.
  65. Pretty J. Can sustainable agriculture feed Africa? New evidence on progress, processes and impacts. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1999, vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 253-274.
  66. Renting H., Marsden T., and Banks J. Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A, 2003, vol. 35, pp. 393-411.
  67. Cassman K.G., Grassini P., and van Wart J. Crop yield potential, yield trends, and global food security in a changing climate. In: Hillel D. & Rosenzweig C. (eds.) Handbook of climate change and Agroecosystems: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 37-51.
  68. Juma C. Preventing hunger: biotechnology is key. Nature, 2011, vol. 479, no. 7374, pp. 471-472.
  69. Miller H. and Conko G. Genetically modified fear and the international regulation of biotechnology. In: Morris J. (ed.) Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle. UK, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000, pp. 84-104.
  70. Pretty J., Brett C., Gee D., et al. Policy challenges and priorities for internalizing the externalities of modern agriculture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2001, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 263-283.
  71. Parfitt J., Barthel M., and Macnaughton S. Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 2010, vol. 365, no. 1554, pp. 3065-3081.
  72. Sen A.K. Poverty and famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981. 268 p.
  73. Sage C. The interconnected challenges for food security from a food regimes perspective: energy, climate and malconsumption. Journal of Rural Studies, 2013, vol. 29, pp. 71-80.
  74. Prodovol'stvennoe embargo: itogi 2015: analiticheskiy doklad [Food Embargo: Results of 2015: Analytical Report]. Moscow: Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, 2016. 39 p.
Как цитировать?
Prosekov A.Yu. and Ivanova S.A. Providing food security in the existing tendencies of population growth and political and economic instability in the world. Foods and Raw Materials, 2016, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 201–211. DOI: 10.21179/2308-4057-2016-2-201-211.
О журнале