ISSN 2308-4057 (Print),
ISSN 2310-9599 (Online)

STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF SEX AND TYPE OF MUSCLES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUALITY DEFECTS IN TURKEY MEAT AFTER THE SLAUGHTER

Abstract
The defects in the quality of the processed meat lead to economic losses of enterprises. With an increase in the share of meat of the turkey sent to the production of meat products, the study of its technological properties becomes an urgent problem. Until now, data on the amount of domestic turkey meat with quality defects have not been collected. In this regard, the pH and microstructure of turkey meat were studied during maturation, which showed that the raw materials that goes through processing had significant quality deviations, which were based on some intravital factors. Thus, the carcasses of turkey cocks with pH20 below 5.6; from 5.6 to 5.9; above 5.9 were, respectively, 26%, 47% and 26% of their total. The carcasses of turkey hens were only divided into two groups: the carcasses with pH20 below 5.6-80%; from 5.6 to 5.9 - only 20%. The histological studies made it possible to describe in detail the nature of autolytic changes in the microstructure of the muscular tissue of pectoral and femoral muscles and confirmed the effect of poultry stress on the formation of technological properties of meat during maturation. The meat of turkey hens, especially pectoral muscles, was most susceptible to the development of quality defects. The presence of overcontraction knots and bands testified to the severity. The study showed that the problem of defects in the quality of turkey meat requires an increase in the responsible attitude towards the compliance with the technologies of poultry pre-slaughtering.
Keywords
Turkey meat, recyclability, muscle fibers, destructive changes
REFERENCES
  1. Gasilina V.A. and Tatarina L.I. Indicies of turkey white and red meat chemical composition in the industrial conditions of Krasnoyarsk region. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, 2010, no. 9, pp. 143-147. (In Russian).
  2. Lesiów T. and Kijowski J. Impact of PSE and DFD meat on poultry processing - A Review. Polish journal of food and nutrition sciences, 2003, vol. 12/53, no. 2, pp. 3-8.
  3. Fernandez X., Sante-Lhoutellier V., Baeza E., et al. Effects of the rate of muscle post mortem pH fall on the technological quality of turkey meat. British poultry science, 2002, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 245-252. DOI: 10.1080/00071660120121463.
  4. Molette C., Remignon H., and Babile R. Effect of rate of pH fall on turkey breast meat quality. British Poultry Science, 2003, vol. 44, no. 5, p. 787-788.
  5. Mitchell M.A. and Sandercock D.A. Spontaneous and stress induced myopathies in modern meat birds: a cause for quality and welfare concerns. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 2004, pp. 100-107.
  6. Fedyuk V.V. and Yagodka Yu.V. Influence of pre-slaughter factors on quality of meat of the turkey. Bulletin of Don State Agrarian University, 2016, no. 4-1(22), pp. 42-48. (In Russian).
  7. Punkt K. Fiber types in skeletal muscles. Series Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002, vol. 162. 112 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59399-4.
  8. Fraqueza M.J., Cardoso A.S., Ferreira M.C., and Barreto A.S. Incidence of pectoralis major turkey muscles with light and dark color in a Portuguese slaughterhouse. Poultry Science, 2006, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 1992-2000. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.11.1992.
  9. Opalka J.R., Wicke M., Gellerich F.N., et al. Mitochondrial function in utrkey skeletal muscle--impact on meat quality. British Poultry Science, 2004, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 367-379. DOI: 10.1080/00071660410001730860.
  10. Sosnicki A.A. Focal Myonecrosis Effects in Turkey Muscle Tissue. MUSCLE BIOCHEMISTRY. Proceedings of the 46th Reciprocal Meat Conference, 1993, pp. 97-102.
  11. Çelen M.F., Söğüt B., Zorba Ö., Demirulus H., and Tekeli A. Comparison of normal and PSE turkey breast meat for chemical composition, pH, color, myoglobin, and drip loss. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2016, vol. 45, no. 8, pr. 441-444. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-92902016000800003.
  12. Averos A., Martin S., Riu M., et al. Stress response of extensively reared yong bulls being transported to growing - finishing farm under Spanish summer commercial condition. Livestock Science, 2008, vol. 119, pp. 174-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.002.
  13. Chulayo A.Y., et al. Beef quality and creatin kinase activities as affected by animal - related factors and season. 60 International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. Punta Del Este, Uruguay, 2014. n.p.
  14. Kalhovde J.M., Jerkovic R., Sefland I., et al. “Fast” and “slow” muscle fibers in hind limb muscles of adult rats regenerate from intestinally different satellite celle. The Journal of Physiology, 2005, vol. 562, no. 3, pp. 847-857. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.073684.
  15. Zyryanova T.Yu. Investigation of molecular mechanisms regulating skeletal muscle fiberphenotype as a theoretical approach of myopathy treatment. Vestnik of saint petersburg university. Medicine, 2014, no. 1, pp. 221-235. (In Russian).
  16. Khrabrova L.A. Inheritable defects of horses: diagnosis and prevention. Farm Animals, 2014, no. 2, pp. 80-91. (In Russian).
  17. Boukhris H., Najar T., Damergi C., Samet A. Sensibilite au transport: evolution de la qualite de la viande de dinde - Caracterisation et frequences des viandes PSE. 15èmes Journées Sciences du Muscle et Technologies des Viandes, Clermont-Ferrand, 2014, r. 109-110.
  18. Medvedskiy V.A. and Medvedeva D.V. Hygienic features of raising turkey males and females for meat. Scientific Notes of Educational Establishment "Vitebsk State Academy of Veterinary Medicine", 2016, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 144-149. (In Russian).
  19. Canato M., Scorzito M.,Giacomello M., et al. Massive alterations of sarcoplasmic reticulum free cflcium in skeletal muscle fibres lacking calseqvestrin revealed by genetically encoded probe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, vol. 107 (51), pp. 22326-22331. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009168108.
How to quote?
About journal

Download
Contents
Abstract
Keywords
References