ISSN 2308-4057 (Print),
ISSN 2310-9599 (Online)

Alternative sweets from cooked pulses and date products: Nutritional and quality characteristics

Abstract
Nowadays, the worldwide market includes a wide variety of sweets with processed sugar. The food industry has been developing alternatives based on health products. This study aimed to formulate alternative, highly-nutritional date-based sweets filled with cooked pulses and sweetened with date products without using processed sugar. Different cooked pulses (red cowpea, soybean, and chickpea seeds) sweetened with date powder or date syrup (dips) were used to prepare alternative date sweets. They were exposed to physicochemical and microbiological analyses and sensory evaluation. Adding pulses to the pulse-date sweet samples significantly raised their contents of protein, fats, crude fibers, total sugars, calcium, iron, and zinc, as well as caloric values, lightness, and water activity. Compared to the control (date paste mixed with dark chocolate), the sweets with cooked pulses had lower contents of ash, carbohydrates, phenolics, and caffeine, as well as lower antioxidant activity and hardness values. Following storage for three months, the water activity and microbiological counts slightly declined. The date sweets filled with cooked pulses had high sensory acceptability. The samples containing cooked red cowpeas and chickpeas were the most acceptable, while those sweetened with date powder had maximum antioxidant activity. Our study revealed that enriching date sweets with cooked pulses increases their nutritional value without involving processed sugar in the final product.
Keywords
Date palm products, soybeans, chickpea, dark chocolate, alternative sweets, nutritional quality, sensory attributes
REFERENCES
  1. Singh P, Pandey VK, Sultan Z, Singh R, Dar AH. Classification, benefits, and applications of various anti-nutritional factors present in edible crops. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2023;14:100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100902
  2. Lisciani S, Marconi S, Le Donne C, Camilli E, Aguzzi A, et al. Legumes and common beans in sustainable diets: Nutritional quality, environmental benefits, spread and use in food preparations. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2024;11:1385232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1385232
  3. Affrifah NS, Phillips RD, Saalia FK. Cowpeas: Nutritional profile, processing methods and products – A review. Legume Science. 2021;4(3):e131. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.131
  4. Dukariya G, Shah S, Singh G, Kumar A. Soybean and its products: Nutritional and health benefits. Journal of Nutritional Science. 2020;1(2):22–29.
  5. Kumari U. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Nutrition beyond protein, bioactives and associated health benefits. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2023;12(9):134–142.
  6. Koul B, Sharma K, Sehgal V, Yadav D, Mishra M, et al. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) biology and biotechnology: From domestication to biofortification and biopharming. Plants. 2022;11:2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212926
  7. Al-Shwyeh HA. Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruit as potential antioxidant and antimicrobial agents. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2019;11(1):1–11.
  8. Aljaloud S, Colleran HL, Ibrahim SA. Nutritional value of date fruits and potential use in nutritional bars for athletes. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2020;11(6):463–480. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2020.116034
  9. Hussain MI, Farooq M, Syed QA. Nutritional and biological characteristics of the date palm fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.) – A review. Food Bioscience. 2020;34:100509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2019.100509
  10. Bulletin of Food Balance Sheet. Economic Affairs Sector. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Egypt; 2021. 60 p. https://www.agri.gov.eg/uploads/topics/16819017944659.pdf
  11. Bhattacharya S. Sugars, sweeteners, chocolates, and sweet snacks. In: Snack Foods Processing and Technology. London: Elsevier, Academic Press; 2023. pp. 211–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819759-2.00003-3
  12. Faccinetto-Beltrán P, Gómez-Fernández AR, Santacruz A, Jacobo-Velázquez DA. Chocolate as carrier to deliver bioactive ingredients: Current advances and future perspectives. Foods. 2021;10(9):2065. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092065
  13. Rajeswari P. Can chocolate be addictive. Food and Agriculture Spectrum Journal. 2020;1(2):108–115.
  14. Shin J-H, Kim C-S, Cha J, Kim S, Lee S, et al. Consumption of 85% cocoa dark chocolate improves mood in association with gut microbial changes in healthy adults: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2022;99:108854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2021.108854
  15. Wang, S, Dong Y. Applications of life cycle assessment in the chocolate industry: A state-of-the-art analysis based on systematic review. Foods. 2024;13(6):915. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060915
  16. Samanta S, Sarkar T, Chakraborty R, Rebezov M, Shariati MA, et al. Dark chocolate: An overview of its biological activity, processing, and fortification approaches. Current Research in Food Science. 2022;5:1916–1943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2022.10.017
  17. Onyeaka H, Nwaiwu O, Obileke K, Miri T, Al-Sharify ZT. Global nutritional challenges of reformulated food: A review. Food Science & Nutrition. 2023;11(6):2483–2499. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3286
  18. Arshad S, Rehman T, Saif S, Rajoka MSR. Replacement of refined sugar by natural sweeteners: Focus on potential health benefits. Heliyon. 2022;8(9):e10711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10711
  19. Abedini A, Dakhili S, Bazzaz S, Moghaddam SK, Mahmoudzadeh M, et al. Fortification of chocolates with high-value-added plant-based substances: Recent trends, current challenges, and future prospects. Food Science & Nutrition. 2023;11(7):3686–3705. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3387
  20. Latimer Jr GW. Official methods of analysis, 22nd edition. AOAC International. Washington DC; 2023. 322 p.
  21. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2005. 1332 p. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10490/chapter/1#xxi
  22. National Research Council. Recommended Dietary Allowances: 10th edition. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1989. 302 p. https://doi.org/10.17226/1349
  23. Kupina S, Fields C, Roman MC, Brunelle SL. Determination of total phenolic content using the folin-C assay: Single-laboratory validation, first action 2017.13. Journal of AOAC International. 2018;101(5):1466–1472. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.18-0031
  24. Vuletic N, Bardic L, Odžak R. Spectrophotometric determining of caffeine content in the selection of teas, soft and energy drinks available on the Croatian market. Food Research. 2021;5(2):325–330. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.5(2).482
  25. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 1995;28(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
  26. Yadav AK, Kumar S, Janghu S, Chaudhary C. Sensory evaluation techniques. In: Mehra R, Pandey AK, Guiné RPF. Sensory Science Applications for Food Production. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2024. pp. 177–196. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2121-8.ch009
  27. Zhang L, Sun D-W, Zhang Z. Methods for measuring water activity (aw) of foods and its applications to moisture sorption isotherm studies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2017;57(5):1052–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1108282
  28. Nishinari K. Textural Characteristics of World Foods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2020. pp. 424. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119430902
  29. Kaysner CA, Angelo D. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods (Fourth Edition). Washington DC: American Public Health Association; 2001. 676 p. https://doi.org/10.2105/MBEF.0222
  30. Heumann C, Schomaker M, Shalabh S. Introduction to statistics and data analysis. (Second Edition). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2022. 584 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11833-3
  31. Ferweez H, Elsyaid SI, Abd Elaal HA, Salh YMS. Optimal method for added value increase of low quality dates obtained from dates packaging factories as by-products. Journal of Food Dairy Sciences, Mansoura University. 2020;11(9):241–246. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfds.2020.117361
  32. Rabie SM, Salem E, Assous M, Afifi M, Mohamed A. Technological and economical studies on production of date powder and paste from some low quality Egyptian dates. Egyptian International Journal of Palms. 2021;1(1):109–123. https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJP.2021.233544
  33. USDA. Food Data Central: official website [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 11]. Available from: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/
  34. Xiao S, Li Z, Zhou K, Fu Y. Chemical composition of kabuli and desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars grown in Xinjiang, China. Food Science & Nutrition. 2023;11(1):236–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3056
  35. Zewudie KG, Gemede HF. Assessment of nutritional, antinutritional, antioxidant and functional properties of different soybean varieties: Implications for soy milk development. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2024;10(1):2380496. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2380496
  36. Kumari A, Pandey S, Chauhan AK, Singh M. Optimization and characterization of functional chocolate with addition of butter fruit milkshake powder as a source of phenolic, flavonoid and carotenoid. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 2021;74(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.33785/IJDS.2021.v74i01.007
  37. Patel H, Bains A, Sridhar K, Ali N, Najda A, et al. An approach to manufacturing well-being milk chocolate in partial replacement of lecithin by the functional plant-based combination. Food Science & Nutrition. 2024;12(6):3920–3934. http://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4051
  38. Radia A, Boukhiar A, Kechadi K, Benamara S. Preparation of a natural candy from date (Phoenix dactylifera L.), olive (Olea europaea L.), and carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) fruits. Journal of Food Quality. 2018;2018(3):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9565931
  39. Erukainure OL, Egagah TI, Bolaji PT, Ajibboye AJ. Development and quality assessment of date chocolate products. American Journal of Food Technology. 2010;5(5):324–330. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2010.324.330
  40. Ibrahim SA, Fidan H, Aljaloud SO, Stankov S, Ivanov G. Application of date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruit in the composition of a novel snack bar. Foods. 2021;10(5):918. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10050918
  41. Çağındı Ö, Ötleş S. The health benefits of chocolate enrichment with dried fruits. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria. 2009;8(4):63–69.
  42. Ripnar CK, Hiremath US, Anitha S. Development and nutrient analysis of cluster bean chocolate. Ecology, Environment and Conservation. 2017;23(1):283–286.
  43. Spilling the beans: How much caffeine is too much? [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 11]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/spilling-beans-how-much-caffeine-too-much
  44. Khalid A, Ahmad S, Raza H, Batool M, Khan Lodhi R, et al. Determination of caffeine in soft and energy drinks available in market by using UV/visible spectrophotometer. Family Medicine and Medical Science Research. 2016;5(4):1000206. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4972.1000206
  45. Abdo NH, Mounir SMM, El-Shewey MT, Omar MM. Sensory, physico-chemical, and functional properties of lupin-based chocolate dessert formulations prepared from Egyptian-sweet white lupin seeds. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research. 2022;49(5):637–652. https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2022.269599
  46. Alkurd RA, AL-Akayleh FT, AL-Remawi MM, Hasan MR, Maqousi A, et al. Evaluation of a Jordanian commercial chocolate brand fortified with micronutrients of vitamins B12 and D3, iron and zinc. Food Science and Technology. 2023;43(6):e105122. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.105122
  47. Agamy NF, Hegazy EM, Younes NM, El-Hossainy AM. Nutritional, safety and sensory evaluation of innovative siwi date snacks with flavors and fillings. Journal of High Institute of Public Health. 2023;53(3):114–125. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/jhiph.2024.345880
  48. Rao P, Yu Z, Han H, Xu Y, Ke L. Dynamic light scattering for food quality evaluation. In: Zhong J, Wang X. Evaluation Technologies for Food Quality. Elsevier; 2019. pp. 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814217-2.00020-2
  49. Pandiselvam R, Mitharwal S, Rani P, Shanker MA, Kumar A, et al. The influence of non-thermal technologies on color pigments of food materials: An updated review. Current Research in Food Science. 2023;6:100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100529
  50. Escobedo-Avellaneda Z, Rodríguez-Martínez V, Serment-Moreno V, Velázquez G, Welti-Chanes J, et al. Selected applications of water activity management in the food industry. In: Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Fontana Jr AJ, Schmidt SJ, Labuza TP. Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Applications, Second Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2020. pp. 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118765982.ch19
  51. Ibrahim SF, Dalek NSEM, Raffie QAFM, Faridatul Ain MR. Quantification of physicochemical and microstructure properties of dark chocolate incorporated with palm sugar and dates as alternative sweetener. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;31(Part 1):366–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.235
  52. Figura LO, Teixeira AA. Water activity. In: Food Physics. Physical Properties – Measurement and Applications. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2023. pp. 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27398-8
  53. Preetha SS, Narayanan R. Factors influencing the development of microbes in food. International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities. 2020;7(3):57–77. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v7i3.473
  54. Sayas-Barberá E, Paredes C, Salgado-Ramos M, Pallarés N, Ferrer E, et al. Approaches to enhance sugar content in foods: Is the date palm fruit a natural alternative to sweeteners? Foods. 2024;13(1):129. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13010129
  55. Sayas-Barberá E, Martín-Sánchez AM, Cherif S, Ben-Abda J, Pérez-Álvarez JÁ. Effect of date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) pits on the shelf life of beef burgers. Foods. 2020;9(1):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010102
  56. Prakash B, Kumar A, Singh PP, Songachan LS. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of phytochemicals: Current status and future perspective. In: Functional and Preservative Properties of Phytochemicals. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818593-3.00001-4
  57. Snyder AB, Martin N, Wiedmann M. Microbial food spoilage: Impact, causative agents and control strategies. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2024;22:528–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01037-x
How to quote?
Omran AA, Hassan NSY, Hanaa AEM. Alternative sweets from cooked pulses and date products: Nutritional and quality characteristics. Foods and Raw Materials. 2026;14(2):252–263. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2026-2-672 
About journal

Download
Contents
Abstract
Keywords
References