Abstract

Introduction. A disadvantage of the ancestral method (la méthode ancestrale), which is widely used in the production of sparkling wine, is that it is difficult to control fermentation. We aimed to identify the optimal yeast race for obtaining high-quality young sparkling wines with varietal aroma without yeast tones.
Study objects and methods. Our study objects were base and young sparkling wines from Cabernet-Sauvignon prepared on various yeast races. Organic acids, sugars, and ethanol contents were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Phenolic and coloring substances were measured by colorimetric method. Foaming properties were determined by air barbotage of a wine sample in a measuring cylinder; sparkling properties, by measuring the CO₂ desorption rate; CO₂ content, by volumetric method; viscosity, with a viscometer. Sensory evaluation was carried out according to standard methods.
Results and discussion. The wines produced on the Odesskiy Chernyi-SD13 yeast race received the highest tasting scores of 7.82 and 9.05 points for base wine and young sparkling wines, respectively. They contained larger amounts of phenolic substances (1103 mg/dm³) and coloring agents (275 mg/dm³) and had higher color intensity (1.614). The panelists rated them highly on their complex varietal aroma and harmonious, velvety flavor, as well as their foaming and sparkling properties. This yeast race ensured intensive fermentation of sugars and a great amount of bound CO₂ (up to 24.93%).
Conclusion. The Odesskiy Chernyi-SD13 yeast race is optimal for making base and young sparkling wines by the bottle method. This technology can be used to produce high-quality sparkling wines in the crop year by large and small enterprises.

Keywords

Fermentation, descriptors, color, aroma, acids, carbon dioxide, foaming properties, sparkling properties

REFERENCES

1. Jeandet P, Vasserot Y, Liger-Belair G, Marcha R. Sparkling wine production. In: Joshi VK, editor. Handbook of enology: principles, practices and recent innovations. API; 2011.
2. Di Gianvito P, Arfelli G, Suzzi G, Tofalo R. New trends in sparkling wine production: Yeast Rational Selection. In: Alcoholic beverages. Volume 7: The science of beverages. Woodhead Publishing; 2019. pp. 347–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815269-0.00011-8.
3. Borrull A, López-Martínez G, Miró-Abella E, Salvadó Z, Poblet M, Cordero-Otero R, et al. New insights into the physiological state of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during ethanol acclimation for producing sparkling wines. Food Microbiology. 2016;54:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.11.001.
4. Martí-Raga M, Marullo P, Beltran G, Mas A. Nitrogen modulation of yeast fitness and viability during sparkling wine production. Food Microbiology. 2016;54:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.10.009.
5. Bozdogan A, Canbas A. Influence of yeast strain, immobilization and ageing time on the changes of free amino acids and amino acids in peptides in bottle fermented sparkling wines obtained from Vitis vinifera cv. Emir. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;46(6):1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02550.x.
6. Sartor S, Toaldo IM, Panceri CP, Caliari V, Luna AS, de Gois JS, et al. Changes in organic acids, polyphenolic and elemental composition of rosé sparkling wines treated with mannoproteins during over-lees aging. Food Research International. 2019;124:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.012.
7. Velázquez R, Zamora E, Álvarez ML, Ramírez M. Using Torulaspora delbrueckii killer yeasts in the elaboration of base wine and traditional sparkling wine. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2019;289:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.09.010.
8. El’darov MA, Avdanina DA, Shalamitskii MY, Ivanova EV, Tanashchuk TN, Kishkovskaya SA, et al. Polymorphism of the iron homeostasis genes and iron sensitivity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae flor and wine strains. Microbiology. 2019;88(2):200–205. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261719020036.
9. Cilindre C, Liger-Belair G, Villaume S, Jeandet P, Marchal R. Foaming properties of various Champagne wines depending on several parameters: Grape variety, aging, protein and CO2 content. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2010;660(1–2):164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.021.
10. Merzhanian AA. Fiziko-khimiya igristykh vin [Physical chemistry of sparkling wines]. Moscow: Pishchevaya promyshlennostʹ; 1979. 271 p. (In Russ.).
11. Arroyo BL, Roberts RP. How specific wine tasting descriptors are? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;198:287–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.447.
12. Niimi J, Boss PK, Bastian SEP. Sensory profiling and quality assessment of research Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay wines; quality discrimination depends on greater differences in multiple modalities. Food Research International. 2018;106:304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.060.
13. Sánchez-Palomo E, Trujillo M, García Ruiz A, González Viñas MA. Aroma profile of malbec red wines from La Mancha region: Chemical and sensory characterization. Food Research International. 2017;100:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.06.036.
14. Lytra G, Franc C, Cameleyre M, Barbe J-C. Study of substituted ester formation in red wine by the development of a new method for quantitative determination and enantiomeric separation of their corresponding acids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2017;65(24):5018–5025. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00979.
15. Kemp B, Herve A, Robillard B, Marchal R. Effect of production phase on bottle-fermented sparkling wine quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2015;63(1):19–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf504268u.
16. Liang C, Ristic R, Jiranek V. Jeffery DW. Chemical and sensory evaluation of magnetic polymers as a remedial treatment for elevated concentrations of 3-Isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine in Cabernet sauvignon grape must and wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2018;66(27):7121–7130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01397.
17. Sáenz-Navajas M-P, Arias I, Ferrero-del-Teso S, Fernández-Zurbano P, Escudero A, Ferreira V. Chemo-sensory approach for the identification of chemical compounds driving green character in red wines. Food Research International. 2018;109:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.037.
18. Ageyeva NM, Avanesyants RV. Influence of ferment preparations of new generation the wine biopolymer. Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia. 2017;46(4):129–140. (In Russ.).
19. Fedosova AN, Kaledina MV, Shevchenko NP, Voloshenko LV, Baydina IA, Trubchaninova NS. Research of the pectolytic ability of saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2019;(3):78–89. (In Russ.).
20. Malakhov AA, Naberegnykh IA. Regulation the quality of sparkling wines with structurally destroyed autolysis of yeast. News of institutes of higher education. Food technology. 2010;316(4):57–59. (In Russ.).
21. Kotenko STs, Islammagomedova EA, Khalilova EA, Abakarova AA. Biotechnological properties of new strain of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y-3980. Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. North Caucasus Region. Natural Sciences. 2016;192(4):45–50. (In Russ.).
22. Makarov AS, Lutkov IP, Peskova IV, Probeygolova PA, Shalimova TR. Influence of strain of yeast chemical composition and quality of red sparkling wines. Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia. 2018;50(2):111–122. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30679/2219-5335-2018-2-50-111-122.
23. Gnetko LV, Zolotarev IO, Arutyunova GYu, Khachaturov VN. The effect of yeast race on the composition of a highmolecular fraction and physical and chemical properties of sparkling wines. New Technologies. 2019;(1):29–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-0920-2019-10103.
24. Mishin MV, Talanyan OR. Assessment of the qualities of sparkling sparkling wines. Scientific works of the Kuban State Technological University. 2015;(8):61–63. (In Russ.).
25. Ageeva NM, Guguchkina TI, Kashkara KE, Kashkara GG, Burda VE. Method of production a young red sparkling wine. Patent RU 2662961C1. 2018.