ISSN 2308-4057 (Print),
ISSN 2310-9599 (Online)

Интенсификация ультрафильтрационного концентрирования путем отделения концентрационного пограничного слоя

The possibility of intensifying the ultrafiltration concentrating of food substance solutions by the separation of the near-membrane flow part that comprises the concentration boundary layer (or diffusion layer) enriched by a useful component has been investigated in this study. A mathematical model of the longitudinal development of polarization on a membrane with consideration of its selectivity (rejection coefficient) has been proposed. The efficiency of the separation of the near-membrane layer has theoretically been estimated on the basis of this model. Some constructions of membrane modules with the separation of the near-membrane layer have been proposed. Experiments have shown that the proposed method allows the concentrate to be enriched in the continuous-flow module by 9‒10%, which is much higher than for the traditional concentrating process. The calculated concentration coefficients are in good agreement with experimental values.
Ключевые слова
ultrafiltration , concentrating , intensification , concentration polarization , rejection coefficient , concentration coefficient.
  1. Brans, G., Schroën, C.G.P.H., van der Sman, R.G.M., and Boom, R.M., Membrane fractionation of milk: state of the art and challenges, Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, vol. 243, pp. 263‒272.
  2. Van Reis, R. and Zydney, A., Bioprocess membrane technology, Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, vol. 297, pp. 16‒50.
  3. Wakeman, R.J. and Williams, C.J., Additional techniques to improve microfiltration, Separation and Purification Technology, 2002, vol. 26, pp. 3‒18.
  4. Krstićś, D.M., Tekić, M.N., Carić, M.D., and Milanović, S.D., Static turbulence promoter in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk, Desalination, 2004, vol. 163, pp. 297‒309.
  5. Pal, S., Bharihoke, R, Chakraborty, S., Ghatak, S.K., De, S., and DasGupta, S., An experimental and theoretical analysis of turbulence promoter assisted ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice, Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, vol. 62, pp. 659‒667.
  6. Popović, S. and Tekić, M.N., Twisted tapes as turbulence promoters in the microfiltration of milk, Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, vol. 384, pp. 97‒106.
  7. Zhou, N. and Agwu Nnanna, A.G., Investigation of hybrid spring-membrane system for fouling control, Desalination, 2011, vol. 276, pp. 117‒127.
  8. Popović, S., Jovičević, D., Muhadinović, M., Milanović, S., and Tekić, M.N., Intensification of microfiltration using a blade-type turbulence promoter, Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, vol. 425‒426, pp. 113‒120.
  9. Taha, T. and Cui, Z.F., CFD modelling of gas-sparged ultrafiltration in tubular membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, vol. 210, pp. 13‒27.
  10. Mercier-Bonin, M., Gésan-Guiziou, G., and Fonade, C., Application of gas/liquid two-phase flows during crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk under constant transmembrane pressure conditions, Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, vol. 218, pp. 93‒105.
  11. Psoch, C. and Schiewer, S., Dimensionless numbers for the analysis of air sparging aimed to reduce fouling in tubular membranes of a membrane bioreactor, Desalination, 2006, vol. 197, pp. 9‒22.
  12. Cheng, T.-W. and Li, L.-N., Gas-sparging cross-flow ultrafiltration in flat-plate membrane module: Effects of channel height and membrane inclination, Separation and Purification Technology, 2007, vol. 55, pp. 50‒55.
  13. Qaisrani, T.M. and Samhabe, W.M., Impact of gas bubbling and backflushing on fouling control and membrane cleaning, Desalination, 2010, vol. 266, pp. 154‒161.
  14. Akoum, O.Al., Jaffrin, M.Y., Ding, L., Paullier, P., and Vanhoutte, C., An hydrodynamic investigation of microfiltration and ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module, Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, vol. 197, pp. 37–52.
  15. Akoum, O., Jaffrin, M.J., and Ding, L.-H., Concentration of total milk proteins by high shear ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module, Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, vol. 247, pp. 211‒220.
  16. Gomaa, H.G. and Rao, S., Analysis of flux enhancement at oscillating flat surface membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, vol. 374, pp. 59‒66.
  17. Kobayashi, T., Chai, X., and Fujii, N., Ultrasound enhanced cross-flow membrane filtration, Separation and Purification Technology, 1999, vol. 17, pp. 31‒40.
  18. Muthukumaran, S., Kentish, S.E., Ashokkumar, M., and Stevens, J.W., Mechanisms for the ultrasonic enhancement of dairy whey ultrafiltration, Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, vol. 258, pp. 106‒114.
  19. Kyllönen, H.M., Pirkonen, P., and Nyström, M., Membrane filtration enhanced by ultrasound: a review, Desalination, 2005, vol. 181, pp. 319‒335.
  20. Cai, M., Zhao, S., and Liang, H., Mechanisms for the enhancement of ultrafiltration and membrane cleaning by different ultrasonic frequencies, Desalination, 2010, vol. 263, pp. 133‒138.
  21. Sarkar, B., Pal, S., Ghosh, T.B., De, S., and DasGupta, S., A study of electric field enhanced ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice and optical quantification of gel deposition, Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, vol. 311, pp. 112‒120.
  22. RF Patent 2181619, 2000.
  23. RF Patent 2234360, 2004.
Как цитировать?
Интенсификация ультрафильтрационного концентрирования путем отделения концентрационного пограничного слоя. Foods and Raw Materials, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 74-81
Кемеровский государственный университет
2308-4057 (Print) /
2310-9599 (Online)
О журнале