ISSN 2308-4057 (Print),
ISSN 2310-9599 (Online)

Assessing protopectin transformation potential of plant tissue using a zoned criterion space

Introduction. The existing diversity of plant raw materials and products predetermine the prospects of studying their potential as sources of pectin substances. However all current classifications are either fragmented or inconsistent. Study objects and methods. Our theoretical ivestigation aimed to develop an adequate classification for all taxa of plant origin, as well as their tissues and derivatives as pectin-containing materials. We developed criteria for assessing transformation potential of the protopectin complex based on the mass fractions of biologically active non-uronide components, native water-soluble pectin, the protopectin complex, and pectin substances. Individual boundary conditions were based on individual pectin potential, protopectin fragmentation potential, and pectin isolation potential. Results and discussion. Based on the boundary conditions, we defined an universal criterion space that included a set of points M in the coordinates expressed by three main criteria. According to individual boundary conditions, the criterion space was divided, or zoned, into four domains corresponding to protopectin fragmentation potential. They were characterized by: 1) lack of pectin potential, 2) ineffective protopectin fragmentation, 3) ineffective isolation of fragmentation products, and 4) effective isolation. Finally, we developed a generalized algorithm to determine the location of points M[μ1, μ2 , μ3 ] in the zoned criterion space, characterizing the plant tissue. Conclusion. Our approach can be used to assess any plant tissue for its protopectin transformation potential, which determines the technological influence on its pectin potential. This approach is universal, i.e., applicable to both plant tissue and its derivatives.
Ключевые слова
Protopectin complex , potential , transformation , evaluation system , criterion space
The materials were prepared as part of the government assignment to Gorbatov Federal Scientific Center for Food Systems at Russian Academy of Sciences.
  1. Galstyan AG, Aksyonova LM, Lisitsyn AB, Oganesyants LA, Petrov AN. Modern approaches to storage and effective processing of agricultural products for obtaining high quality food products. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019;89(2):211–213. DOI:
  2. Galstyan AG, Turovskaya SN, Ryabova AE, Illarionova EE, Semipyatnyi VK, Radaeva IA, et al. Technological additives as an element of dry milk properties directed formation. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of Geology and Technical Sciences. 2019;4(436):95–102. DOI:
  3. Lee BH. Fundamentals of food biotechnology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. 544 p. DOI:
  4. Bhatia SC. Food biotechnology. CRC Press; 2017. 412 p.
  5. Holban AM, Grumezescu AM. Preface for volume 14: Advances in biotechnology for food industry. In: Holban AM, Grumezescu AM, editors. Advances in biotechnology for food industry. Elsevier; 2018. pp. 23–26. DOI:
  6. Caffall KH, Mohnen D. The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydrate Research. 2009;344(14):1879–1900. DOI:
  7. Thakur BR, Singh RK, Handa AK, Chemistry and uses of pectin – A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 1997;37(1):47–73.
  8. Srivastava P, Malviya R. Sources of pectin, extraction and its applications in pharmaceutical industry – an overview. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources. 2011;2(1):10–18.
  9. May CD. Industrial pectins: Sources, production and applications. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1990;12(1):79–99. DOI:
  10. Müller-Maatsch J, Bencivenni M, Caligiani A, Tedeschi T, Bruggeman G, Bosch M, et al. Pectin content and composition from different food waste streams in memory of Anna Surribas, scientist and friend. Food Chemistry. 2016;201:37–45. DOI:
  11. Ovodov YuS. Current views on pectin substances. Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry. 2009;35(3):269–284. DOI:
  12. Pectin [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 04]. Available from:
  13. Sato MF, Rigoni DC, Canteri MHG, Petkowicz CLO, Nogueira A, Wosiacki G. Chemical and instrumental characterization of pectin from dried pomace of eleven apple cultivars. Acta Scientiarum – Agronomy. 2011;33(3):383–389. DOI:
  14. Baker RA. Reassessment of some fruit and vegetable pectin levels. Journal of Food Science. 1997;62(2):225–229. DOI:
  15. Donchenko LV. Razrabotka i intensifikatsiya tekhnologicheskikh protsessov polucheniya pektina iz sveklovichnogo i drugikh vidov syrʹya [Development and intensification of technological processes for the production of pectin from beet and other raw materials]. Dr. eng. sci. diss. Kiev, 1990. 360 p.
  16. Donchenko LV, Karpovich NS, Simkhovich EG. Proizvodstvo pektina [Pectin production]. Kishinev: Shtiintsa; 1994. 181 p. (In Russ.).
  17. Donchenko LV. Tekhnologiya pektina i pektinoproduktov [Technology of pectin and pectin products]. Moscow: DeLi; 2000. 256 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Donchenko LV, Firsov GG. Pektin: osnovnye svoystva, proizvodstvo i primenenie [Pectin: basic properties, production and application]. Moscow: DeLi print; 2007. 275 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Rodionova LYa. Teoreticheskoe i ehksperimentalʹnoe obosnovanie tekhnologii pektinosoderzhashchikh izdeliy funktsionalʹnogo naznacheniya [Theoretical and experimental substantiation of the technology of pectin-containing functional products]. Dr. eng. sci. diss. Krasnodar: Kuban State Technological University; 2004. 48 p.
  20. Rodionova LYa, Donchenko LV, Sobol IV, Stepovoy AB. Pectin containing raw materials classification extension. Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 2015;(52):199–206. (In Russ.).
  21. Galstyan AG, Semipyatnyy VK. K voprosu o rasshirenii oblasti otsenochnykh kriteriev kachestva pishchevykh produktov [On the issue of expanding the field of evaluation criteria for food quality]. Aktualʹnye voprosy industrii napitkov [Current issues in the beverage industry]. 2017;(1):27–29. (In Russ.).
  22. Oganesyants LA, Khurshudyan SA, Galstyan AG, Semipyatny VK, Ryabova AE, Vafin RR, et al. Base matrices – Invariant digital identifiers of food products. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of Geology and Technical Sciences. 2018;6(432):6–15. DOI:
  23. Harrington EC. The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control. 1965;21(10):494–498.
  24. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington: National Academies Press; 2005. 1358 p. DOI:
  25. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition: report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. 265 p.
  26. Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition: report of an expert consultation. Rome: FAO; 2010. 166 p.
  27. Carbohydrates in human nutrition. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Rome: FAO; 1998. 140 p.
  28. MR–08 Normy fiziologicheskikh potrebnostey v ehnergii i pishchevykh veshchestvakh dlya razlichnykh grupp naseleniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Norms of physiological requirements for energy and nutrients for various population groups of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor; 2009. 36 p.
  29. Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition. 2nd ed. Rome: WHO and FAO; 2004. 341 p.
  30. Human vitamin and mineral requirements. Rome: FAO; 2001. 303 p.
  31. U.S. Department of Agriculture [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 04]. Available from:
Как цитировать?
Assessing protopectin transformation potential of plant tissue using a zoned criterion space. Foods and Raw Materials, 2020, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 349-361
Кемеровский государственный университет
2308-4057 (Print) /
2310-9599 (Online)
О журнале